Identifying keno trends is an independent sports news and information service. has partnerships with some of the top legal and licensed sportsbook companies in the US. When you claim a bonus offer or promotion through a link on this site, Gaming Today may receive referral compensation from the sportsbook company. Although the relationships we have with sportsbook companies may influence the order in which we place companies on the site, all reviews, recommendations, and opinions are wholly our own. They are the recommendations from our authors and contributors who are avid sports fans themselves.

For more information, please read How We Rank Sportsbooks, Privacy Policy, or Contact Us with any concerns you may have.

Gaming Today is licensed and regulated to operate in AZ, CO, CT, DC, IA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MD, MI, NV, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA, WV, & WY.

It’s hard to know when a
“trend” is actually a trend. Football bettors like to use what they
call trends in selecting games to bet.

For instance, a player might want
to bet a conference underdog at home following a bye week because that situation
has produced winners in three of the past four games.

Of course, with such a small
sampling it’s difficult to rely on such a stat, especially when you’re
backing it with hard-earned cash.

As a keno player, I think I found
a trend in which major jackpots occur shortly after “re-setting” the
keno machine.

Lately, I think I’ve found
another trend that happens in a large volume of cases. And that is, if I hit a
number of 6-of-7 jackpots on a Four Card Keno machine, by switching to 8-spots
the machine often gives up a nice 7-of-8 catch with a payoff of 1,652-to-1.

This has happened several times
over the last week. Sometimes it’s difficult to stop playing 7-spots because
the machine “is acting” like it’s going to hit because of the 6-of-7

But more often than not the
machine simply doesn’t get there for the big payoff, thus the 7-of-8 is a
welcome “consolation prize.”

I’ve also noticed that, while
playing Four Card Keno, when a “mirror” pattern occur next to my
cluster, it seldom ever follows that mine will be so fortunate.

Perhaps the machine is programmed
to replicate the patterns you’ve marked, only in another section of the board,
just to tease you into thinking you have hope. I don’t know. Or maybe the
numbers I’ve marked are “locked out” of the machine’s hit pattern
and fill in more liberally elsewhere.

But I’ve discovered through too
many hours of hunkering down over keno machines that it doesn’t follow that I’ll
catch a winner if the numbers next to mine keep filling in the same pattern.

Instead, what I have found is
that a lot of “re-setting” of the machine sometimes helps to break
this vicious, annoying cycle. That is, cashing out and starting again, or just
closing out the keno game, returning to the main menu, and then coming back to
the keno game you were playing.

I can’t offer a scientific
explanation why this seems to work. Only each new game probably begins a new
cycle for the computer, and most of the major jackpots I’ve ever hit were
within a few plays of re-setting the machine.

How do I determine how frequently
to reset the machine? Using the cluster example of four 8-spots marked onto 15
numbers (such as two adjoining columns), I re-set when it appears that the
pattern isn’t getting the “appropriate” amount of hits for the total
numbers marked.

With a total of 16 numbers
marked, probability theory holds that you should catch, on average, four numbers
per game. The odds of catching four are 3.98-1.

But, obviously, catching only
four numbers out of 16 isn’t going to cut it. I’ve determined, that the
machine is working “properly” when you can average six hits a game
(the odds are 9-1).

For whatever reason, when a
machine consistently hits six or more numbers out of 16, a big hit could be on
the way.

And, by big hit I mean catching
nine, 10 or 11 numbers. When you can corral that many numbers out of 16, it
usually holds that the machine will put seven or eight of them into the right
pattern, thus triggering a decent jackpot.

Like I noted, this isn’t
scientific, mathematically-based or otherwise proven in a physics laboratory.
But it seems to hold. Let me know if something like this has worked for you.

About the Author

Get connected with us on Social Media