The powerful Nevada Resort
Association (NRA) is considering lobbying for legislation that would alter how
gaming licenses are “grandfathered,” according to sources close to the
Gaming Control Board.
Among the issues that the NRA
wants addressed is the exemption to the 200-room hotel requirement that some
grandfathered licenses enjoy, and the ability to relocate the license into areas
not zoned for casinos.
“The NRA is looking at what
we can do to clean up some of these legislative issues that impact gaming,”
said John Farahi, chairman/chief executive of Monarch Casino & Resort in
Reno. “It would help to strengthen the industry and stop us from having
Farahi is in conflict with a
casino that has been proposed across from the Reno-Sparks Convention Center,
just a block from the Monarch hotel. The developers have secured the
unrestricted gaming license from the defunct Reno Turf Club, a casino that was
demolished to make way for downtown redevelopment.
The original Reno Turf Club had
no hotel rooms, and the developers are proposing to build a casino up to 20
times larger than the original, but without any guest rooms.
Farahi said he welcomes the
competition, but the new casino owners must enter the market on a level playing
field. “You don’t go buy a license to avoid building rooms,” Farahi
Also under scrutiny by the NRA is
where a grandfathered license can be used to build a new casino.
In another case — also in Reno
— a developer has proposed building a casino in the Spanish Springs community,
which is located outside the downtown area.
But the property first must be
rezoned to allow for a casino, which would be licensed through the former Old
Reno Casino, another casualty of redevelopment.
Some existing casino operators
are opposed to a so-called neighborhood casino so far from the downtown tourist
district, especially under a grandfathered license.
On this issue, state regulators
have said the jurisdiction lies with local governing bodies, such as planning
commissions and city councils.
“The state statute provides
a mechanism that allows a licensee to attain grandfather rights in the event of
a government taking,” said Dennis Neilander, chairman of the Gaming Control
Board. “But the way the statute reads is that if the license is moved, it
is subject to any local approvals. We’ve always considered the ongoing license
to be subject to any ongoing local requirements.”
Whether these issues — how and
where to build a casino under a grandfathered license — warrant changes in
state law is uncertain, experts say.
“There are a couple of
agendas being discussed,” said Stephen Park, an attorney involved in the
opposition to the proposed Reno casinos. “One has to do with the existing
exemption (the grandfather clause). We would go back and amend that
Peek offered no timetable for the
introduction of any new legislation.
But changes to the Nevada Revised
Statutes are notoriously difficult to navigate through the legislature, which
convened three weeks ago.
For instance, last week a bill
was introduced that would establish a statewide lottery designed to help fund
education in Nevada.
It was the 23rd time since 1975
that a lottery has been proposed for the state.