Was this really a Bad Beat in the World Series of Poker?

GamingToday.com is an independent sports news and information service. GamingToday.com has partnerships with some of the top legal and licensed sportsbook companies in the US. When you claim a bonus offer or promotion through a link on this site, Gaming Today may receive referral compensation from the sportsbook company. Although the relationships we have with sportsbook companies may influence the order in which we place companies on the site, all reviews, recommendations, and opinions are wholly our own. They are the recommendations from our authors and contributors who are avid sports fans themselves.

For more information, please read How We Rank Sportsbooks, Privacy Policy, or Contact Us with any concerns you may have.

Gaming Today is licensed and regulated to operate in AZ, CO, CT, IN, LA, MI, NJ, NY, PA, TN, and VA.

If you play much poker, you are bound to experience a Bad Beat – at least what you regard as one.

According to Michael Wiesenberg’s The Official Dictionary of Poker, a Bad Beat is “the situation in which a strong hand is beaten by a long shot or improbable hand, particularly when the holder of the eventual winning hand should never have been in the pot in the first place…”

Was this a bad beat?

In Thomas Green’s new book, Texas Hold’em Poker Textbook, he describes a hand played in the 2008 World Series of Poker that was labeled a Bad Beat. (The book is available through www.poker-textbook.com.)

In a middle position, Mabuchi had pocket Aces. On the Button, Phillips held K(diamond)-J (diamond) . The flop was A-9-Q rainbow, including the Q (diamond) giving Phillips three diamonds plus a draw to Ace-high straight. Meanwhile, Mabuchi had connected for a set of Aces! The turn brought the 10 (diamond) , giving Phillips an Ace-high straight against Mabuchi’s set of Aces. Phillips also had a draw to a Royal Straight Flush, needing the A (diamond) …

Also, the 9 (diamond) would give him King-high Straight Flush. When the A (diamond) fell on the river, Mabuchi must have been ecstatic with his Quad Aces. Little did he know that Phillips now had a Royal Straight Flush. Mabuchi bet; Phillips raised. Then Mabuchi went all-in. Phillips called, taking the huge pot and eliminating Mabuchi from the tournament – even while holding Quad Aces!

Was this really a Bad Beat?

I asked Green this question. His response (in part): “Mabuchi started with what is considered the best starting hand in poker and improved it to the max, but still lost. I call that a bad beat.” Makes sense, but…

On the turn, Mabuchi was behind. Remember, Phillips had just made a straight, which Mabuchi could only suspect. Mabuchi had eight outs to make a winning hand with a full-house against Phillips’ straight. He might have counted the remaining A (diamond) and the 9 (diamond) but they really weren’t true outs since either would give his opponent a Straight Flush.

With eight outs and the river card yet to come, the probability that Mabuchi would beat out Phillips’ straight was 17.4% – as shown in a chart in Green’s book. The odds were almost 5-1 against – a long shot! The A (diamond) on the river gave Mabuchi Quad Aces, but Phillips made a Royal Straight Flush – the best hand in poker!

Did Mabuchi really suffer a Bad Beat?

After all, Phillips was in the lead on the turn with his Ace-high straight against Mabuchi’s three Aces. Mabuchi was an underdog to win the pot on the river. While the A (diamond) improved both hands, Phillips kept the lead.

Here’s a Bad Beat I suffered about a year ago in a limit game. In late position, with hole cards of A (spade) -10 (spade) , the flop brought two more of my suit. Then, on the turn, the 8 (spade) gave me the Ace-high flush – the NUT flush! There were three opponents in the pot against me, including a very pleasant middle-aged woman across the table from me. The board showed:

5 (spade) – 7 (spade) – K (Heart) – 8 (spade).

With no pairs on the board, a full-house was not possible. I loved my hand and contemplated winning a healthy pot. Then the river brought the 4 (spade). I should have been more cautious. After the lady checked, confident in the strength of my nut flush, I bet out. Surprise! She raised… I quickly re-raised, she raised back!

Now I paused to study the board more carefully. If she held the 6 (spade), her straight flush would beat my nut flush. Hoping she had a lesser hand, I called. She turned up pocket 6s, one of which was the 6 (spade)!

Now that’s really a Bad Beat.

Only one card could beat my hand. The odds that she held it were over 40-1 in my favor. Actually, with the 6 (spade) in the hole, she had two outs – the 9 (spade) and the 4 (spade) – over a 20-1 long shot. No matter how you look at it, I had suffered a Bad Beat…

Comments? George “The Engineer” Epstein can be contacted at [email protected]

 

About the Author

George Epstein

A retired engineer, George Epstein is the author of “The Greatest Book of Poker for Winners!” and “Hold’em or Fold’em? – An Algorithm for Making the Key Decision.” He teaches poker courses and conducts a unique Poker Lab at the Claude Pepper Senior Center under the auspices of the City of Los Angeles Dept. of Recreation and Parks and at West Los Angeles College.

Get connected with us on Social Media