To Top

Idaho Law Enforcement Backs US Bills to Block Animal-Fight Betting

Idaho law enforcement is pushing passage of three bills in Congress that would help to curb betting on animal fighting.
Idaho police supports three U.S. bills to combat animal-fighting operations.
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Gaming Edge’s TL;DR

  • Idaho law enforcement groups have urged Congress to strengthen federal laws targeting staged animal fighting, including banning in-person and online betting tied to those events.
  • This push centers on three bills – the FIGHT Act, No Flight, No Fight Act, and the ACE Act – that would add enforcement tools and curb criminal networks that profit from animal fights.

Major Idaho law enforcement organizations – the Idaho Sheriffs’ Association and the Idaho Prosecuting Attorneys Association, representing all 44 counties – publicly backed federal measures to toughen anti-animal fighting laws.

They endorsed the FIGHT Act (H.R. 3946/S. 1454), which would ban in-person and online gambling on animal fights, restrict shipment of mature roosters through the US mail, allow seizure of fighting pits after convictions, and permit narrowly tailored citizen suits to shut down fighting complexes.

The Sheriffs’ Association also backed the No Flight, No Fight Act (H.R. 7371) to bar air transport of adult roosters trafficked for cockfighting, and the ACE Act (H.R. 1477) to create a dedicated DOJ unit for felony animal-cruelty prosecutions.

Idaho officials highlighted risks to agriculture, public safety, and criminal spillover – including links to drug trafficking, firearms, money laundering, and organized gambling.

New laws could dismantle all animal-fight operations

The FIGHT Act’s explicit ban on both in-person and online betting tied to animal fights reduces ambiguity that some illicit operators exploit. That could mean:

  • Heightened investigations into payment flows, peer-to-peer transfers, and platforms facilitating bets on animal fights
  • Increased scrutiny of advertising and affiliate traffic that may indirectly promote illegal events
  • Greater liability risk for platforms, wallets, or processors knowingly facilitating wagers

Licensed gaming operators are unlikely to be directly affected if they maintain compliance and block prohibited markets, but payment providers and “gray‑market” sportsbooks that tolerate illicit events could face enforcement actions, asset seizures, or civil suits.

The ACE Act’s DOJ unit and authorities to seize pits and trafficking shipments would strengthen investigators’ ability to dismantle criminal networks that blend animal fighting with other illegal gambling and financial crimes.

Based on reporting by Animal Wellness Action.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the online gambling field in the US, where he's been for over five years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get GamingToday latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
Something went wrong. Please try again later