To Top

Judge Bars Arizona from Blocking Kalshi Operations in the State

A federal judge has ruled that prediction market firm Kalshi can continue to operate in Arizona as legal proceedings advance
Kalshi can continue to operate in Arizona for now.
Photo by Ceri Breeze/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Gaming Edge’s TL;DR

  • A federal court has temporarily blocked Arizona from enforcing its gambling laws against prediction market operator Kalshi and paused the state’s criminal case.
  • This ruling, tied to a CFTC lawsuit, questions whether event contracts are federal swaps rather than state-regulated wagers.

US District Judge Michael Liburdi issued a temporary order preventing Arizona from applying its gambling statutes to prediction market operators and stayed Kalshi’s scheduled arraignment.

The decision followed a lawsuit by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which argued event contracts fit the Commodity Exchange Act’s definition of swaps and fall under the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction.

The order cited the CFTC’s showing that it had a reasonable chance of proving federal pre-emption.

Arizona had charged Kalshi with 20 misdemeanor wagering counts, alleging the platform accepted bets on politics, college sports, and player performance. Kalshi says it operates a financial marketplace where customers trade contracts with one another, not bets against a house. The CFTC and Kalshi argue federal oversight should apply.

Court rulings on prediction markets vary by state

The ruling means Kalshi’s platform is less likely to face immediate state-enforced shutdown in Arizona, so users may continue accessing event contracts while litigation proceeds.

If courts ultimately treat prediction markets as swaps under federal law, operators could gain a clearer national regulatory framework under the CFTC, reducing the patchwork of state bans and criminal prosecutions that have limited market access in some jurisdictions.

That said, outcomes remain mixed across states. Several courts have sided with states in preliminary rulings, while others favored Kalshi.

Expect continued litigation and appeals: Arizona’s attorney general is reviewing next steps, and the federal government has sued other states (including Connecticut and Illinois) over similar regulation attempts.

Based on reporting by The Associated Press.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the online gambling field in the US, where he's been for over five years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get GamingToday latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
Something went wrong. Please try again later