To Top

Minnesota Election Could Reshape Sports Betting Push

A deal among Minnesota tribes, horse tracks and charities has eased one sports betting obstacle. Legislative elections could shift the balance, but opposition spans both parties.
Minnesota State Capitol: Minnesota State Capitol, 75 Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, St Paul, Minnesota, USA. Viewed from the south during a small demonstration by Somali Americans.
Photo by McGhiever / CC BY-SA 4.0 / Wikimedia Commons
Gaming Today Newsroom Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Minnesota’s legislative elections could help break the sports betting stalemate after tribes, horse tracks and charities reached an agreement. Opposition within both parties remains a major hurdle, according to Covers.

Minnesota’s Narrow Legislative Margins Face Voters

All 134 Minnesota House seats and 67 Senate seats are on the Nov. 3 ballot. The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party holds a 34-33 Senate majority.

The House began the 2026 session tied at 67-67. A Republican resignation subsequently left the DFL with 67 seats to Republicans’ 66, with one vacancy.

Those narrow margins put legislative control at the center of the legalization debate. The DFL has generally favored a tribal-controlled sports betting market, while Republicans have pushed for broader access for horse tracks, charitable gaming groups and other organizations.

Prediction markets favored Democratic control in the snapshots cited by Covers. As of Tuesday, Kalshi displayed an 89% probability of Democratic control of the House and an 87% probability of Democratic control of the Senate. Polymarket put Democrats’ chances of winning the state Senate at 87%.

Stakeholder Deal Leaves Political Divisions

The agreement among tribes, horse tracks and charities has eased one obstacle to legalization. Minnesota’s 11 tribal nations remain central to the DFL’s preferred framework, but the party also faces opposition within its own ranks.

DFL Sen. John Marty has opposed online sports betting and advocated restrictions that include bans on in-game wagering and push notifications. Opposition among lawmakers in both parties continues to threaten passage, even with the stakeholder compromise.

The competing approaches have derailed legislation before. In 2022, the House advanced a tribal-controlled proposal, but a Senate committee amended it to include racetracks. Lawmakers adjourned without an agreement.

More from gamingtoday.com

—

Source: As reported by Covers.

AI Disclosure
This content was created, reviewed, and approved by Gaming Today Newsroom. We use AI to help draft and refine text, but every review, news piece, and update goes through our editorial team before publishing. See our Editor Guidelines for more.
About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS

Gaming Today Newsroom is our byline for news, guides, and informational content created with the help of AI-assisted tools. Every piece published under this byline goes through review by our editorial team and News Editor, who check facts, context, and fit with our editorial standards before anything goes live. Pairing AI tools with hands-on editorial oversight lets us cover more ground without sacrificing the accuracy and quality our readers expect.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get GamingToday latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
Something went wrong. Please try again later