Share 
There has been an influx of Capitol Hill activity revolving around prediction markets. Still, US Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., is now calling for an investigation by the Office of Inspector General into the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
A longstanding critic of the prediction markets industry, Titus sent a shot across the bow of the CFTC on June 2 by formally requesting the OIG investigate its regulatory practices.
Titus, House democrats urge federal ccrutiny of CFTC
In a letter to Christopher Skinner, CFTC inspector general, co-signed by fellow Democrats Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut and Jared Huffman of California, Titus excoriated the agency’s litigation strategy and its allocation of resources, citing the federal government’s encroachment on state-level affairs:
“Over the past several weeks, the CFTC has filed a series of lawsuits against multiple states, including Rhode Island, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, and New York, asserting exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction market platforms. These actions directly challenge state enforcement efforts against entities offering contracts tied to the outcomes of sporting events.
In the Wisconsin case, for example, the state sought to regulate platforms such as Coinbase, Kalshi, Robinhood, Polymarket, and Crypto.com for operating unlawful sports betting enterprises under the guise of financial instruments. The CFTC’s response to pursue litigation marks a significant escalation in its interpretation of its federal authority and runs counter to prior assurances from Chair Michael Selig that the Commission would defer to the courts on matters related to sports event contracts.”
According to a post by The Closing Line, the letter also raised concerns about resource allocation, noting that the CFTC is a comparatively small, underfunded agency and that redirecting its limited personnel toward a multi-state litigation campaign threatens its ability to fulfill its primary mandate.
Nevada’s gaming industry sees an existential threat
Titus represents the district that includes Las Vegas, and she and the gaming industry view prediction markets as an existential threat to legal sports betting and casinos — particularly in Nevada, where signing up for online sportsbooks is more restricted than in dozens of other states.
CFTC digs in as state battles mount
CFTC Chairman Selig has vigorously defended his agency’s jurisdiction over prediction markets, which he maintains are legitimate derivatives trading platforms not subject to state-level oversight or enforcement. As of late May, 13 states have active enforcement actions, litigation, or both against prediction market platforms, according to AOL.
Why an OIG investigation is a long shot
An OIG investigation, however, remains an unlikely outcome. Titus called upon Skinner to put the CFTC under the microscope regarding its regulatory position on prediction markets, but he was appointed to his post by Selig, and both serve in the Trump administration, which has maintained strong ties to the industry. Donald Trump Jr. is an investor in and an unpaid advisor to Polymarket, as well as a strategic advisor to Kalshi.
Trump himself has weighed in forcefully on the matter. Posting on Truth Social, the president called it “critically important that the CFTC’s exclusive authority over Prediction Markets is maintained” and labeled state officials who oppose that position — including Chris Christie, Letitia James, Tim Walz and JB Pritzker — “SCUM.” The post, reported on by Front Office Sports, includes governors and attorneys general who have moved to regulate or restrict prediction market platforms in their states, not members of Congress.
