Share 
Quickly, New York built the largest online sports betting market in the country. Now, Albany is taking a long look at what it created, and lawmakers are clearly in the mood for changes. A flurry of new bills has come to the state Legislature in the past week. Each one aims to alter how sports betting works, what people can bet on, and how sportsbooks can treat their customers.
Taken together, the proposals signal a shift in tone. The conversation is no longer about launching mobile betting or raising tax revenue. It’s now about limits, guardrails, and control.
A bill that would redefine what a “legal bet” is
Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner has introduced the most dramatic idea. Her bill, NY A0 9636, would limit legal sports betting to wagers on the final score, the outcome, or the outright winner of a sporting event. Everything else would be eliminated.
That includes proposition bets, in-game bets, and even over/under totals. Current New York law clearly allows people to wager on parts of events and on individual player statistics. Woerner’s bill would remove that language entirely, making the betting menu more like what traditional sportsbooks offered.
Sportsbooks that violate the rules could face harsh penalties, including fines of up to $100,000 per violation and possible suspension or revocation of their license. The bill has been sent to the committee, but no hearing date has been scheduled. Nevertheless, the scope of the proposal has already drawn attention from industry professionals.
New bill could cap betting accounts by default
Another pair of proposals shifts the focus from what bettors can wager on to how much they can wager. Assemblyman Alex Bores is behind a bill that would require New York sportsbooks to apply default betting limits to every account.
Those limits would not be fixed in statute; instead, the New York State Gaming Commission would set the specifics. Bettors could opt out, but accounts would start with a capped limit rather than unlimited access.
Supporters frame the idea as a baseline for consumer protection, particularly for new users. Critics say it adds friction to a market already operating under one of the highest tax rates in the country.
A pushback against limiting winning bettors
Bores is also sponsoring a bill aimed at a long-running complaint among serious bettors: being limited in winning. The proposal would prevent sportsbooks from restricting customers solely because they are profitable or skilled.
Limits would still be allowed in cases involving suspicious activity or concerns about problem gambling. Operators would be required to notify affected bettors within 24 hours, explain the reason for the restriction, and direct them to state gambling resources.
The idea mirrors “fair play” discussions happening in other states, though no U.S. regulator has yet banned limiting outright.
VIP rule, KYC, and prediction markets join the mix
Woerner has additional bills that target other corners of the betting ecosystem. One would raise the minimum age for sportsbook VIP programs to 25 and require affordability checks before enrollment. Another would tighten know-your-customer rules, explicitly banning account sharing and proxy betting.
Prediction markets also make an appearance. A separate proposal would prohibit state officials and legislative employees from using nonpublic information to trade on event contracts, reflecting growing concern as those platforms gain traction.
