Share 
Gaming Edge’s TL;DR
- The NFL has urged the CFTC to toughen its proposed rules for sports prediction markets.
- It told the regulator body it should set a minimum trading age of 21 and ban certain contract types the league says are especially vulnerable to manipulation.
In a comment letter filed by the latest deadline in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) rulemaking process on prediction markets, the NFL said the proposal falls “significantly short” on integrity, consumer protection, and market-manipulation concerns.
The filing adds one of the most prominent voices yet to the fight over how federally regulated sports-event contracts should be treated.
The NFL asked the CFTC to move away from a case-by-case approach for some products and instead prohibit categories of contracts it considers too risky. The league specifically pointed to contracts tied to discretionary officiating decisions, individual player performance, and so-called “knowable in advance” markets, such as the first play of a game or certain coaching and roster decisions.
The NFL wrote:
“We believe these objectionable contracts are detrimental to the long-term health of these markets, to the public, and to the leagues.”
According to the Front Office Sports report, the league also pushed back on the idea that questionable contracts should remain available simply because demand exists or because trading might otherwise migrate to offshore venues. In its letter, the NFL said, “contracts imposing the greatest public interest concerns may be among the highest-traded. We do not believe that otherwise non-compliant contracts should be permitted because they are in high demand or might otherwise be traded on offshore markets.”
Age limit and operator impact
The NFL’s filing also asks the CFTC to require users to be at least 21 years old to trade sports-event contracts. That would be stricter than the current minimum age of 18 cited in the report for platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket.
The age issue matters because prediction markets have increasingly drawn comparisons to traditional sports betting, even as they operate under a different regulatory framework. The broader debate has implications for trading platforms, state-regulated sportsbooks, leagues, and federal regulators.
The report also noted that companies and platforms tied to the wider debate include Kalshi, Polymarket, FanDuel Predicts, DraftKings Predictions, and Robinhood.
Dodd sends comment
The NFL’s letter arrived at the close of the latest CFTC comment period. Front Office Sports reported there were 736 total comments on the proposal after late submissions were added Tuesday morning, up from 130 by the deadline. A prior 45-day comment period generated 1,541 submissions.
Former US Sen. Christopher Dodd also weighed in with a separate comment letter. Dodd argued that he does not believe the Dodd-Frank law was meant to allow federally regulated markets to override states’ authority over sports betting. In his filing, he wrote:
“The explosion of prediction markets – especially sports wagering and event contracts – represents the type of rampant speculation we sought to prohibit with the Dodd-Frank bill.”
Based on reporting by Ben Horney for Front Office Sports.
