To Top

Ohio Bills Would Treat Sports Predictions Like Gambling, Outlaw Election Bets

Ohio Sen. Bill DeMora is pressing for two bills covering prediction markets: one applying sports gambling rules and another prohibiting election betting.
ohio
Photo by Shutterstock/Sean Pavone
Brian Sausa Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Ohio Sen. Bill DeMora wants sports prediction markets subject to the state’s sports betting rules and election-related contracts prohibited.

His two bills are awaiting committee hearings. The session ends Dec. 17 and bills from 2026 do not roll over to 2027.

DeMora Cites Sixth Circuit Decision

DeMora, a Columbus Democrat, renewed his call for state oversight of prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket following a federal appeals court decision.

According to his statement, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that prediction markets can be regulated under the state’s sports betting laws. The statement does not identify the case or detail the ruling’s scope.

“This decision solidifies that prediction markets are not exempt from Ohio law, and that they need to be regulated the same way other sports betting companies are,” DeMora said.

He also argued that Ohio is losing “tens of millions of dollars every month” by not regulating the sites.

Two Bills Target Sports and Election Contracts

DeMora’s proposals address two different types of prediction-market activity:

  • Senate Bill 430 specifies that using prediction markets to bet on sporting events constitutes sports gambling and is subject to the same state regulations.
  • Senate Bill 479 would prohibit individuals from betting on elections and prohibit prediction markets from offering election-related contracts.

More from gamingtoday.com
– Sixth Circuit Ruling Could Make Kalshi Pull Sports Predictions From More States
– Climate Prediction Markets Surge as Kalshi and Polymarket Expand Weather Betting
– Prediction Markets On Murder Trials Draw U.S. Court Scrutiny

—

Source: As reported by ohiosenate.gov.

AI Disclosure
This content was created, reviewed, and approved by Brian Sausa. We use AI to help draft and refine text, but every review, news piece, and update goes through our editorial team before publishing.
About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS

Brian Sausa is a New York-based content creator for Catena Media with extensive experience across the iGaming industry, covering sports betting, online casinos, sweepstakes casinos, and prediction markets. A journalism graduate with a wide-ranging background, Brian has previously worked for the flagship sites of multiple professional sports leagues, including MLB and the NHL.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get GamingToday latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
Something went wrong. Please try again later