To Top

Prediction Markets Shut Out of Kentucky Derby Betting

The Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 bars prediction markets from trading on the Kentucky Derby, though that could change in the future
Prediction markets stay on sideline for Derby.
Photo by Shutterstock AI/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

Gaming Edge’s TL;DR

  • Prediction market apps like Polymarket and Kalshi have not listed Kentucky Derby betting for 2026, keeping wagering confined to traditional pari‑mutuel channels.
  • The Derby drives hundreds of millions in bets, and any shift toward prediction markets could reshape revenue flows for tracks and bettors across the US.

Major prediction market platforms have conspicuously avoided offering contracts on the 2026 Kentucky Derby.

Polymarket briefly listed a Derby contract but removed it after direct outreach from Churchill Downs. Kalshi has not listed Derby markets in recent years and declined to comment on future plans.

At the heart of the dispute is the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978, which gives racetracks and related entities control over how horse wagers are offered.

Churchill Downs CEO Bill Carstanjen has said tracks must give “express consent” for wagers tied to their races. Tom Rooney of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association left open the possibility of agreements but confirmed none currently exist. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which oversees many prediction markets, has not publicly clarified how federal oversight would interact with horseracing law.

Prediction markets could hinder races

The exclusion of prediction markets from Derby betting preserves the status quo: Pari‑mutuel pools remain the primary path for wagering on high‑profile races.

The stakes are high. Last year’s Derby produced roughly $234 million in bets on the race and over $470 million across the week at Churchill Downs. Those pools fund purses, racetrack operations, breeding programs, and tax receipts.

Economists warn that if prediction markets siphon betting volume away, pari‑mutuel payouts, field sizes, and long‑term financial health could suffer.

Implications for players include:

  • No alternative price discovery on mainstream prediction apps for Derby outcomes
  • Continued need to use racetrack partners and sportsbooks for official bets
  • Potentially fewer incentives for tracks to expand race cards if revenue erodes

Operators can pursue licensing deals with tracks or press legal challenges that could be lengthy and uncertain. Expect negotiations, regulatory scrutiny, and possible legal fights before any prediction market can offer sanctioned horseracing contracts.

Based on reporting by Johnny K. for World Casino Directory.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the online gambling field in the US, where he's been for over five years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get GamingToday latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
Something went wrong. Please try again later